|
|
Score |
Indicators |
|
|
Graphics/
Relevance |
Collaboration |
Grammar |
Creativity |
Attractiveness |
Presentation |
|
|
10 |
All graphics are related to the topic and make it easier to understand |
Consistently demonstrates ability to work collaboratively |
There are no grammatical mistakes in the presentation |
Presentation by team made me exceptionally excited about the country |
The presentation is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness |
Engaging presentation of information that accurately and clearly identifies the traits their country. |
|
|
7 |
All graphics are related to the topic and most make it easier to understand |
Often demonstrates ability to work collaboratively. |
There is 1 grammatical mistake in the presentation |
Presentation by team made me excited about the country |
The presentation is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness |
Accurate presentation of information that clearly identifies traits of their country. |
|
|
3 |
All graphics relate to the topic |
Infrequently demonstrates ability to work collaboratively |
There are two grammatical mistakes in the presentation |
Presentation by team was boring. |
The presentation is acceptably attractive though it may be a bit messy |
Mostly accurate presentation of information that identifies traits of their country. |
|
|
1 |
Graphics do not relate to the topic |
Never demonstrates ability to work collaboratively |
There are more than two grammatical mistakes in the presentation |
Presentation by the team made me fall asleep. |
The presentation is messy or very poorly designed. It is not attractive. |
Presentation of information is incomplete and/or inaccurate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|